The topic for the October 12 City Symposium discussion is digital privacy. This topic has been proposed by Jim Rule:
I have been interested in the concept of privacy for several years. My attention in this subject was further enhanced by the Snowdon affair, the hacking of cell phones of world leaders (Merkel) and the rapid demise of political candidates in the last federal election.
In my search, I found I two books for further exploration into this topic:
Is Privacy Dead? The Future of Privacy in the Digital Age by David Houle, 2013 IBSN 9781479010127
Intellectual Privacy: Rethinking Civil Liberties in the Digitsl Age by Neil Richards, 2015
To begin the discussion on this subject I chose the following questions from Richard’s book as follows:
What does it mean to have privacy in a Digital Age?
What kind of rights should we have…in the communication of information about us?
In a quote by Zadie Smith, an American novelist, ‘In the Anglo-American world we race ahead with technology and hope that the ideas will look after themselves’ In response to that quote,
Has the idea of privacy and the values inherent in this idea llagged behind our technological advancements?
…whether it’s your laptop, your IPhone, your tablet or your digital camera, be sure to smile because you never know who’s watching!
See you at Chaucers (Atrium) on Wednesday, October 12, at 7pm!
At our next discussion, Shelley Carr will facilitate a conversation exploring our ideas and assumptions about mental health:
Coming from a family with both schizophrenia and bipolar disorder, and a sufferer of GAD I have seen the wonders of mental illness but also the suffering. If we could eliminate Mental illness totally, would our world be a better place?
August 10, 7pm, at the Atrium in Chaucer’s Pub. See you there!
(Also: now is a great time to pitch a topic for our October 12 discussion!)
There is no official City Symposium event scheduled for July. However…
…a few of us were chatting at the last symposium about the idea of getting together for an informal pint or two anyway. I (James) would like to propose that we meet up at Chaucers on Wednesday, July 20, at 7pm to have a drink and discuss … whatever comes up! No specific topic or facilitator — just a pub night to visit with interesting people. (Note: this informal evening will not take place in the Atrium; we will be in the main pub area.) If you are interested in coming, please hit reply and let me know!
The next actual/organized City Symposium event is scheduled for Wednesday, August 10th. You should jet over to citysymposium.com/ideas to vote for a discussion topic or pitch a presentation idea.
The next City Symposium discussion is on Wednesday, June 8, at 7:00pm (Chaucers’ Atrium room)
The topic for this dialogue: Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD): Disorder or Superpower, as proposed by Matt Ross:
As someone who was diagnosed with ADD and took medication for many years, I’m fascinated by the tension between how ADD is perceived in our society, and how we deal with that perception. Now in my life, I see it as a super power, my greatest gift, years before this, I thought it was my greatest curse. I want to explore this tension, and how it plays out in our society.
Also: the poll for future discussion topics has been reset. Jump on over to the ideas page to pitch some ideas for upcoming meetings.
The next City Symposium discussion will be held on Wednesday, June 8 (7pm in the Chaucer’s Atrium). It’s time to cast your votes for a topic and a facilitator. Swing by citysymposium.com/ideas to pitch a theme and/or vote for an idea!
This is just a brief reminder to join us at 7pm in the Chaucer’s Atrium this Wednesday to discuss: ‘Learning from the Past’
All the details about the conversation are available here: http://citysymposium.com/2016/03/31/can-we-understand-the-present-without-understanding-the-past/
Hope to see you there!
The next City Symposium gathering is Wednesday, April 13 at 7pm at Chaucer’s Pub.
Here’s the topic proposal with the most votes for this event: Can we understand the present without understanding the past? by James Shelley
I have finished a rough draft of a book about the role that ancient literature plays in contemporary society. My thesis is straightforward: the papyrus, codices, and writings of the past teach us things about ourselves that we can learn in no other way. I’d like to take advantage of a room full of smart people (that’s you!) to pitch my thesis and get your critiques and input.
RSVP, learn more, and invite your friends at http://learningfromthepast.eventbrite.ca/
This event is also on Facebook at https://www.facebook.com/events/1692127061040912/
Our next pub conversation is schedule for Wednesday, April 13 at 7pm. It’s time to vote for the topic.
You might also be interested in this event coming up at the London Public Library on Monday, April 18 at 7pm:
If you haven’t done so already, be sure to check out this post for links and background for this Wednesay’s discussion. We will be launching our discussion by exploring a ‘systems approach’ to thinking about society change. Grabbing this preamble (homework!) will probably be helpful.
See you at 7pm at Chaucers (Atrium room) this Wednesday!
You might also want to jump on board with the Facebook event page for this discussion too.
Our first gathering of 2016 is only two weeks away!
Here’s the question voted up for discussion:
How do we (actually) make positive changes in society?
(Proposed by James Shelley)
I’d like to have a high level discussion about how society transforms and evolves. To prompt the dialogue, I’d invite everyone to read an essay entitled ‘Leverage Points’ by Donella Meadows. This essay to serve as a lens to provoke/frame our initial thoughts.
If you would rather not read the entire article (about 9,300 words), I recently condensed the main thesis into a 12 minute video presentation as part of another project. (Note: in this video, I am applying Meadow’s theory to poverty reduction specifically. In our discussion on February 10th, I hope our conversation explores how we think about change in other political, social, and environmental arenas as well. In Meadow’s argument, these are all interrelated.)
Of course, the assumption that we can (or should) actually try to change society at all is also up for consideration. Join us on Wednesday, February 10th, at 7pm at Chaucers (Atrium room) for a discussion about the nature of change itself.
Know some other people who might interested in joining this discussion? Invite them to join you on February 10th, and be sure to invite them to sign up for this email list for further updates.
Facebook event details here.